I'm a Committed Free-Market Advocate, But Universal Medicare Is the Top Hope for US Health System
Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. HDHP. HSA. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.
Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the right medical coverage for our business – or for our families – appears to require demands advanced expertise in healthcare.
The Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It's Costly
Based on a recent study, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is projected to exceed $17,000 for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.
Now federal operations is shut down due to partisan disputes regarding subsidies which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.
When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?
How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.
I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. How our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.
The Way National Health Insurance Could Function
A national health insurance program would require contributions from workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee making average wages pays approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute about 13.75%.
Does this appear expensive? Not if you compare it to what average US resident spends. I know dozens of clients that are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that in inclusive programs, those payments include pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection along with supporting medical services. When including those costs compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.
Execution for America
In the US, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's military, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the system should be outsourced to third-party administrators instead of federal agencies.
Advantages for Entrepreneurs
A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for small businesses like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would render management much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).
It would enable simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complicated (and fruitless) process of negotiating with major insurers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would exist a better understanding about benefits among workers – contrasted with the current system where they have to decipher the complications of current options. And there would definitely exist less liability for employers as we no longer have access to our employees' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and different options.
Capitalist Perspective
I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that government play important functions in society, including national security to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses which hire more than half of American employees and fund half the economic output. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.
Addressing Concerns
Are there numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working very well. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes required, would still be a superior and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage to everyone.
Need for Realistic Evaluation
We as Americans, must tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places well below numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, based on major studies. Maybe one bright spot amid present circumstances could be that we take a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.