🔗 Share this article

In a per curiam ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for Texas to use a redrawn congressional map that could add up to five additional Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 decision, released on Thursday, approves a request by the state to overturn a federal judge's injunction that had rejected the new map in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The federal judge wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, generating significant confusion and disturbing the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the supreme court said in detailing its ruling.

The federal court had determined that Texas had likely sorted voters according to their race – a method known as racial gerrymandering – when it enacted the boundaries. It had instructed the state to revert to the maps created after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Stinging Dissenting Opinion

With a sharply worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's action. She argued that it undermined the work of the lower court, observing that its opinion was written by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan stated in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, Today's ruling solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased partisan advantage, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas residents, without justification, will be placed in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced year in and year out, is a infraction of the law of the land.

National Map-Drawing Fight

The ruling is part of a countrywide battle over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to secure a narrow Republican majority. Usually, boundary revision takes place after a ten-year survey. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to proceed with a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that could add a number of additional conservative seats. Democratic lawmakers, in response, have pushed back with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Political Responses

The Texas attorney general praised the High Court's decision. In a statement, he said the order defended Texas's prerogative to draw a map that ensures representation favorable to his party. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he remarked.

In contrast, opposition party representatives criticized the outcome. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major party campaign committee.

A senior Democratic leader said the court had another time eroded its legitimacy by upholding a race-based map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.