🔗 Share this article

Over an extended period, coercive communications recurred. Originally, supposedly from a retired cop and a retired army general, and then from the authorities. In the end, Mohammad Khurshid Shaikh claims he was ordered to the police station and told clearly: keep quiet or encounter real trouble.

Shaikh is among those resisting a high-value redevelopment plan where this historic settlement – one of India’s largest and most storied slums – will be demolished and modernized by a large business group.

"The unique ecosystem of Dharavi is exceptional in the planet," states the resident. "However their intention is to destroy our community and prevent our protests."

Opposing Environments

The narrow alleys of Dharavi present a dramatic difference to the high-rise structures and luxury apartments that overshadow the neighborhood. Dwellings are assembled randomly and often lacking adequate facilities, small-scale operations emit toxic smoke and the environment is saturated with the overpowering odor of exposed drainage.

For certain residents, the prospect of the slum's redevelopment into a glistening neighborhood of premium apartments, neat parks, contemporary malls and homes with proper sanitation is a hopeful vision achieved.

"There's no proper healthcare, proper streets or drainage and there's nowhere for children to play," explains a tea vendor, fifty-six, who migrated from his home state in that period. "The only way is to demolish everything and construct proper housing."

Community Resistance

However, some, like Shaikh, are opposing the redevelopment.

All recognize that Dharavi, historically ignored as an illegal encroachment, is urgently needing economic input and modernization. But they fear that this plan – absent of community input – is one that will convert valuable urban land into a luxury development, forcing out the marginalized, migrant communities who have been there since generations ago.

This involved these excluded, relocated individuals who developed the empty marshland into a frequently examined example of local enterprise and commercial output, whose output is worth between a significant amount and a substantial sum a year, making it one of the world's largest informal economies.

Resettlement Issues

Among approximately one million inhabitants living in the crowded sprawling neighborhood, fewer than half will be eligible for new homes in the redevelopment, which is estimated to take seven years to complete. Additional residents will be moved to undeveloped zones and coastal regions on the far outskirts of Mumbai, threatening to break up a generations-old community. Certain individuals will be denied residences at all.

Those allowed to remain in the area will be allocated flats in high-rise buildings, a significant rupture from the evolved, communal way of living and working that has maintained this area for so long.

Businesses from garment work to ceramic crafts and waste processing are expected to shrink in number and be relocated to a specific "commercial zone" distant from people's residences.

Livelihood Crisis

In the case of Shaikh, a leather artisan and multi-generational resident to call home the slum, the project presents a fundamental risk. His informal, multi-level workshop makes garments – sharp blazers, luxury coats, decorated jackets – distributed in high-end shops in the city's affluent areas and overseas.

Household members resides in the spaces below and employees and tailors – workers from north India – also sleep in the same building, allowing him to manage costs. Away from this community, Mumbai rents are typically tenfold more expensive for minimal space.

Threats and Warning

In the government offices nearby, a visual representation of the redevelopment plan illustrates a contrasting outlook. Fashionable residents mill about on cycles and electric vehicles, purchasing western-style baked goods and pastries and enlisting beverages on a patio adjacent to a coffee shop and Ice-Cream. This represents a stark contrast from the 20-rupee idli sambar first meal and budget beverage that sustains the neighborhood.

"This is not improvement for residents," states Shaikh. "It's a huge property transaction that will make it unaffordable for us to survive."

Additionally, there exists skepticism of the corporate group. Headed by an influential industrialist – among the country's wealthiest and an associate of the government head – the corporation has encountered allegations of crony capitalism and financial impropriety, which it disputes.

Although local authorities labels it a joint project, the business group invested a significant amount for its majority share. A lawsuit alleging that the project was unfairly awarded to the developer is under review in the nation's highest judicial body.

Ongoing Pressure

After they started to actively protest the project, Shaikh and other residents claim they have been subjected to an extended period of pressure and threats – involving phone calls, clear intimidation and insinuations that criticizing the development was equivalent to speaking against the country – by figures they allege are associated with the corporate group.

Included in these alleged to have making intimidations is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c